HomeKeeperU will now be revolving it’s blog through the pages before settling it in the post.
The Right to the gain of our ability, is in as inalienable as it is Natural. Natural, if it is not maligned or, in any way, self denigrated. Most every individual, in every culture, and probable Human-kind in the entirety of the Universe, wonders what they’re capable of. Some are nervous, others excited. Some have heightened predications to there abilities, still others are draught by the expectations of such knowledge. This and all that follows is not just a consequence of Life. For an ameba, never wonders about its existence and a mollusk doesn’t aspire to be a crab. A crab, knows it exist, but doesn’t wonder about the extent of its make. While a pigeon knows procreation, it questions not service, after it serves its young . It may, however, question itself as to how high it can fly. A dog may question what size animal it can bring down. It observes how it serves the pack and how the pack may serve the dog, but has no hope or want of its abilities outside of that. A gorilla does all these things and can give comfort in the way of humor to its mates. It can spend hours, days or its lifetime in compassionate empathy and sympathy. It can take revenge for loss. It can love and self sacrifice. It can learn something every day and want to learn more, but does not consider the culmination of its learning. It does not practice dedication to self-betterment and it can not effectively protect itself from Mankind. Humans mentally can do everything the other animals can’t, won’t, or don’t do. Humans will hope to do more by emotional, mental, physical, Spiritual, and cognitive disciplines, then by physical and cognitive adaptations. These adaptations subtlety diminish the Human capabilities mocking their aspirations, though. We question the extent of our abilities and the scopes of what they mean to the future of our personally perceived Worlds and the World. Undeterred, Human Children instinctively assess all of their abilities and imagine more. With guidance, they fulfill all that they can based on their developing outlook and the outlook of their guidance. All of this, limited only by outlooks of their Worlds and the World. Additionally, this probably takes place outside of our Planet with Children, everywhere Humans and humankind exist. It’s simply, Humanly, wondrously, as instinctual as babies putting nourishment to their mouths. A suckling baby knows where to put the nourishment, its mouth.
Some proclaim Humans don’t have instincts, which I, of course, think is bunkum. Why does a baby not put that, which it hopes to be nourishment, to its ear or butt-cheek to understand if these things will take in food until it has an ego. A Instinct is not choice but, prompts choice. A spider builds a web by instinct but, chooses an area to build it. And, even if we assert the selection of the place is instinct, the spider must, with its senses, evaluate the fitness of the space the instinct selects and the insect that is in its web, to know if it meets the requirement of its instinct. Our instincts have, by evolution, genetic device or lesser embedding, grown appreciatively subtle. When we identify a characteristic, so broadly share by our species, without any teaching to it, we may rest assured that we’ve identified a Human instinct. Also that, it has suffered evolution, doubt and second thought, War, famine, and other cataclysmic devastations. It has outlasted, our impetuous desire, to separate ourselves in succession from other animals and the Planet, itself. Such tenacity and distinction, whether we believe in, Human instinct, evolution, GOD, or just observable importance, we dam-well know it is there for good reason. Certainly it must be essential to the survival of the species. So, of intelligence, common sense, or “a good feeling about this, the members of the specie should cherish, and behaviorally expound on its vitality. That is, “the ability to aspire”. Any well-adjusted monkey or dog would respect their lesser informity and lesser ability to appreciate. Naturally, we would never want to interfere, decimate, or destroy this life giving nuance.
I mean, what would happen if every time a Child said, “I want to…,” or “I want to be…,” we tried to encourage the most associated ability to that desire? Or, if we provide the nearest sensation to the presently impossible. When putting “fly” in the first question, we snatch them up and zoom them through the air, their arms and legs reaching their limits, in front and behind. Placing, “a firefighter” in the second question, we build a very small and easily controlled fire, in front of them, and in short time, encourage them, ‘if they haven’t’, to put it out. We keep with every such intrigue, provoking interest from time to time, to see if any such interest is still there. If their ability is slighted in one area, we motivate them to strengthen, and or, inspire them in a related ability. if not so good at running, maybe they’re a terrific jumper. Theoretically, depending on the Children’s initial state of wonder, and stamina, which directly correlates to the abundance of Spirit, the World should be a Happy and contented, body. It should be enchanted with possibilities bubbling new probabilities out of impossibility.
Now, what if the opposite is done. What if when saying, “I want to…,” the Child receives a punishing blow from a back-hand. The gets a correction in how they will be allowed to speak, “Please I please to… Ma’am/Sir.” When saying, “I please to be a firefighter, Ma’am/Sir. They’re stood before an raging bonfire and are handed a squirt-bottle full of water. They’re asked, “Do you still want to be a firefighter?” The Child responds, “Pleas, yes please, Ma’am/Sir.” The Parent/Guardian slowly presents the Child’s favorite stuffed friend and confidant. It’s the one the Child asks questions of, and receives imaginary advice, spoken of their own broken voice. The Child’s voice is changed, ‘of course’, to be from the stuffed friend. Without remorse or regret, the stuffy is thrown to the blaze, and is engulfed in the flames. The Parent/Guardian tells the Child to “save your friend. Put out the fire, or, reach into it.” The Child without a tear, being the 5th generation raised this way, asks, “Please, can I, please have more water Ma’am/Sir?” The Child is answered, “Water costs money. You gonna pay for it?” Your lucky you got this much for your lesson!!” The Parent/Guardian in a voice, mimicking the Child’s stuffy’s voice screams, “Save me, I thought you were my friend? I thought you were a firefighter?” A tear followed by others break forth from the Child’s genetically hardened eyes. They cry to the stuffed friend, “I want to, but I can’t…, I’m not…,” The Parent/Guardian implores, “Your not what?” The Child now, fully crying, answers,”I’m not a firefighter!!!” The Parent/Guardian demands, “Louder!” and the Child repeats louder, “I’m not a firefighter!!!” The Parent/Guardian changing to the stuffed friend’s voice, makes the same, ‘complied with’, demands several more times. They tell the Child, “You remember what happens to things that comfort you!!” They grab the Child’s hand and briskly walk from the fire, then stops and turns to the Child. “You drink that water that you didn’t even open and throw on the fire… I said drink it!” The Child opens the bottle and drinks the water. The Parent/Guardian finishes with, “You’ll figure this life out sometime.” Then brings the Child to the spread of newspapers, that he sleeps on and offers him a brand new stuffed friend. The Child declines, and the Parent/Guardian throws it to the moonlight floor, where it lay in the light of window’s shadow. The door slams on the room that hasn’t even a light in it. The sound of a news broadcast eventually puts the Child to sleep. The End.
Now, what kind of World do we have? Multiply the Childhood by its likeness in every degree thereof, and what kind of World do we have? What kind of People and adults do our Children have to interact with? The Occupational Parenting Economy makes every effort to have the Child/Children encouraged not to hate the Parent no matter what, By every psychological, economic, and educational tool available, the Child will be, within their safety, taught to love, And by the Child’s choosing, there will be an unlimited amount of attempts to successfully introduce the Parent to the Child’s Life. Again within the Child’s, physical, psychological, cognitive, emotional, and Spiritual health, first priority. That’s how important the bonds of Childhood/Parenthood succession are. And the fact that we don’t know and live by that importance, is evidence of our unsatisfactory position in the Human Condition.
Though it may not be us, some may say, “I want my Child raised that harshly, it’s my Right as a Parent.” The Occupational Parenting Economy acknowledges such a Child would grow up “harder than woodpecker lips” but that the negatives are far more substantial than the positives. The adult such a Child will become, is severed from other persons, animals, the Planet, and the Universe. Frankly, we can say it disables the Child, as they are cut of from vital aspects of themselves, emotions being the most obvious. The Occupational Parenting Economy that demands that we learn about the Human and his’/hers’ Condition. We will know and understand every individual Child’s limits. It’s just as important to the Economy to understand every Parent’s, ‘and as they evelop’, Child’s desires for the adult they will become. We will become more familiar with the Human Condition, his’/hers’ Environment/Domain and how we define these. While the Occupational Parenting Economy will cater to each Parent and Child, it will also acknowledge we live on the Planet together. To do that we have obligations to each other as well as the Planet.