<p>Any “Appropriated Government Official” or “Expert by Credential or history” may desire to appoint any willing American Citizen to be an “Expert of Instance” in their fitness to the same description. The desire to appoint the “Expert of Instance” carries the requirement of that same expert’s fitness in the time allotted. The “Expert of Instance” shall be free from bias if equitable to their ‘View’ and shall be of the magnitude of all other experts. The “Expert by Credentials or history”, shall be the Foremost Authority and present themselves by the aspects, knowledge, interest, and economy. If the knowledge, and/or interest are inadequate they may not present by economy and 1 other aspect alone. The Court in the event of in-adequacy, may compel the Foremost Authority, to be the Expert by Credentials or history. The dynamic, “to the value of life” shall take precedence over any engagement of the Foremost Authority. The Foremost Authority will present by availability. Any 5 citizens of a ‘View’ or ‘Side’ of either or both of the aforementioned Child/Parent or Parent/Child need(s) whom, desire to appoint an “Expert of Instance may do so”. If there are more than 5 different ‘Views’ of the aforesaid need(s) at least one representative of each different or same ‘View’ must acknowledge the fledgling “Expert of Instance’s” understanding of the same to acknowledge them to be a “Pledge” to an “Expert of Instance”. There may be but need not be one “Pledge” per/’View’. If determined to a “Pledge”, they may be qualified for the “Instance” by any means of qualification/fitness to the Instance and further the vast knowledge of Child/Parent and Parent/Child development and there-after may be recognized as an “on-going Expert” of Child/Parent and Parent/Child evelopment/development. As by the choice of the “on-going Expert” and acceptance of either the “Expert by Credential or History” whom will also be recognized as the “Foremost non-Governmental Expert” or the “Appropriated Government Official”, the “on-going Expert” shall be a “non-Governmental Expert” and perhaps the “Foremost non-Governmental Expert” or “Appropriated Government Official”. The “on-going Expert of Instance” shall have to serve 2 years in acceptance of their expertise. If accepted by neither the “Foremost non-Government Expert” nor the “Appropriated Government Official” the on-going “Expert of instance” may become, by choice, an Independent Expert of Child/Parent and Parent/Child evelopment/development. The “Foremost non-Governmental Expert” and the “Appropriated Government Official” must offer 2 out of every 3 “Experts of Instance” a 2 year position reflecting the “Expert’s by Credential or History” or the “Appropriated Government Official’s wealth”. Peliminarily or after, the assignment to “Expert of instance”, the peliminary “Pledge” or Appointed Expert may decline responsibility if their initial observation is proven false and no longer be an “Expert of instance”. If the Expert of Instance proves themselves correct, they may decline the on-going Expert position but they are an Expert of history.</p>
<p>The Appointor must inform a Court of the desire to choose an “Expert of instance” immediately. The Court and Appointor are to inform “them”, who are of a different ‘View’ and legal ramification and “they” who are, of said legal ramification, are to inform the Court. There shall be, by the Court’s acknowledgement a ‘time start’ to a ‘1st time period’ that shall be 1hour of a 24 hour day. The chosen Citizen shall name and submit agreement to a person of the chosen Citizens Polar ‘View’ such as is, the time needed to solicit the support of 4 other persons plus the Appointor, to the ratification of their own appointment to be a “Pledge”. A person of the Polar ‘View’ shall accept or alter such a time for the assignment of 5 persons of the Polar ‘View’ with the same allowance of time for the chosen Citizen to complete said Citizen’s ratification. The chosen Citizen shall seek the same agreement of all ‘Views’ contrary to their own ‘View’. If agreement shall be achieved the chosen Citizen is appointed to be “Pledge”. At all junctures of the proceedings the Appointor may redeem the Appointee’s/”Pledge’s” knowledge appropriate to the relevance of the “Instance”.</p>
<p>The ‘1st time period’ closes 1 hour of a 24 hour day after the time start. All Contrary ‘Views’, ‘Polarized ‘Views’, and “Pledges”, must be indicated in that same ‘1st time period’. The close of the 1st time period and the opening of the 2nd time period are the same. The ‘2nd time period’, is called upon by the Appointee/”Pledges” ‘View’ and deemed appropriate by the Appointee following the events in the ‘1st time period’. The ‘2nd time period’ shall be 1 hour of a 24 hour day in which it shall be decided the amount of time that will comprise the 3rd time period. If agreement as to the amount(s) of time to establish and assess the “fitness of expertise of the “Instance”, in the “Pledge”. If agreement has not been had in the 2nd time period a consult shall be constituted by option of the “Pledge”, Appropriated Government Official or the Court. A minimum of “‘1 hour in the ‘1st time period'” shall have passed or a maximum of “‘2 hours in the ‘1st and 2nd time periods'” shall have passed since the Court and opposing ‘View’ were informed and a consult may be chosen by the “Appointee/Pledge” of willing Citizens. in the ‘4th time period’. If the ‘4th time period’ is not claimed by the deficiencies in the ‘3 previous time periods’. If all criteria for the first 2 time periods are not executed in 2 hours or less the process shall begin again without the negation of any original element. All times shall be kept by the military hour. If the 2nd time period is yet undecided or deemed inadequate by the Court the ‘3rd time period’ shall be ‘1 hour of a 24 hour day’ to decide a ‘4th time period’ in which the activities involved with the ‘fitness of expertise for the Instance’ shall be carried out. No more than 3 hours have passed since the informaty of Court and the Polar ‘Side’. </p>
<p>If a reasonable time cannot be elected for ‘any time period’ of the 1st and 2nd time periods, 7 willing American Citizens can be elected, 4 by the Appointee and Appointor at the discretion of the Appointee/”Pledge” and 3 by the Polar ‘View’. If there be more than a Polar ‘View’, then each ‘View’ shall select one and the Court shall select the remaining of 7. The same 7 shall sit for all ‘Views’. An election process must be fully collaborative with the Other Side(s). All ‘Views’/’Sides’ shall have 5 hours of a 24 hour day of the 8 hours from informitiy of the desire for an expert of “Instance”. The Appointee shall choose the 7 Citizens by proximity, in the literal and metaphoric meanings, of the term “proximity”. And the Sides will do well to comprise and entreat both meanings, proportional to the “preponderance and emphasis” in the “instance”. The group of 7 shall be a Consult. A record of the 7 Citizens shall be kept by all Sides. In the failure to elect the Consult, The appropriate Court shall have 5 hours, 12 hours the from informaty of the desire to appoint an Expert of Instance. The appropriate Court shall compel, the difference of 7 American Citizens, to the number of willing Citizens, for the sum of 7 who will be Consult and Counsel, for the duration of the case. In its, best informaty, the Court shall compel all 7 Citizens, if necessary, most complementary to the previous description, of proportional to the “preponderance and emphasis” in the “instance”. The Foreperson of the Consult shall be appointed, of the willing Citizens first, by the original or most perplexed concern of any one Expert of Instance Appointee. If not confirmed by the Appointor and the 5 representatives of the Polar Side, the Court shall confirm the appointee’s choice or choose another foreperson. In the case with no Polar Side, any 5 from any other Views may confirm the appointment, so to, may the the Court, as well. There-after all sides shall be free of all burdens, of the Consult, but not direct decisions in the case, and the Court shall make all pre-judgement confirmations concerning them. The Consult shall make decisions based on majority rule. And the Court shall hold in, contempt of their position, all of them that do not wholeheartedly and, if necessary, explanitorily vote their conscience. The foreperson shall make all proposals to vote on from interactive lists, within the confines of the needs of all sides, or the needs of Court if presiding instead. The Court shall set time for the Consult’s decisions based on the requests of all sides. If the Consult is unable to produce timely decisions, the Court shall make the decision but, after the forfeiture of 3 decisions passed as prejudgment confirmations by the Court, in a series of 7 decisions for the Consult, the Court must, be in its own deliberation to reconstitute the members of the Consult. And there shall be a second reasonably elected period of time by the 2 sides, or if initiated, the Consult, or finally if need be, the Court. In that time period a Presenting Authority of the non-appointor/apointee side shall have to put forth 5 names of its members in support of the original appointee. Or present a compelling reason(s) that the appointee should not be an Expert of Instance authorized by 5 members of the Presenting Authority’s side.The first 2 time periods, and all the considerations there of, must allow both the appoitor/appointee side and the other side to know the 2 time periods In Judgement within one 24 hour day inclusive of all natural time zones. That day shall begin when the appropriate Court and the Other Side are, simultaneously in the in the ability of the best available technology, informed of the appointment to “expert of instance”. The 1st time period In Judgement is of Further Support of the appointee and 2nd time period In Judgement is of Acceptance or Denial of the appointee from the non-appointee side. A second 24 hour day may be voted on by the Consult anytime within the 1st 24 hour day. The appropriate Court, informed of the appointment, may also increase the limit of the 1st day by 24 hours. The Consult or appropriate Court have within their discretion, the ability granted by The People, to extend the first 24 hour day, 24 hours to be a second day inclusive of al naturall time zones to be a time period of 48. hours. Any “expert of instance” may become so, of the agreement of which ever is lesser of, all of the citizens involved in an instance of either or both of a Child/Parent or Parent/Child need(s).</p>
<p>Only the citizens may dis-allow their “Expert of Instance” at any time during the proceedings. They may also demand the allowance of a new “Expert of Instance” and the “Expert’s of Instance fitness for the Instance shall be decided by any 5 citizens already in the standing of the case. There shall be “‘1 week’ for the ‘1st and 2nd time periods'” upon the initial disallowance with a total of 3 dis-allowances allotted. In the 1st and 2nd time periods or the ‘1 week’ the choice of the New “Expert of Instance” plus the time of/for the “fitness of the of/for the Instance” must be decided. The 1st time period of the dis-allowance is the equivalent of the ‘3rd time period of the preliminary proceedings which started the “Expert of Instance process. This 1st and 3rd time period shall be ‘no less than 2 weeks’ but may be more at the request of the 5 citizens with the pre-judgement confirmation of the Court.</p>
<!– wp:paragraph –>
<p></p>
<!– /wp:paragraph –>