Statement Against Pending Charges
(Written for an Attorney’s Review)
Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx v. The State of Xxxxxxx
XXXXXXX 53a-167c 52a-167a
XXXXXXX 53a-182
XXXXXXX 14-227a 14-235
Your Honor, I am not a lawyer but I did study LAW and hope to finish a degree in the future. I hope not to seem too abrasive in my statements. I love and respect the LAW. Quite a bit of it seems to have changed since I was a kid in trouble. Perhaps such changes were in place after leaving the Army and finding myself challenging the legal system, in the pursuit of some comfort from my Gulf War Illness. An Illness that had claimed me body and Soul. A few years later, which was about 15 years ago, I had another misunderstanding with Law Enforcement upon them separating me from my most Loved and cherished Daughter. She meant and means everything to me. Though, my record shows me to be a repeat offender, I have in no way chosen a life of crime nor one in disrespect to the LAW. I have had my struggles which were near, too much for me to bear, but I have and am making every effort to close all deficiencies in my life, and move forward with the more positive and successful life choices I have started, all along the way. My commitment is to LAW, and if I am able to return to School to finish my degree, I hope to write among those contracting the LAW.
Xxxxxxx Criminal Procedure Xxxxxxx Warrants are not presumptively required for public felony arrests, or for public misdemeanor arrests based on acts committed in an officer’s presence or based on the speedy information of others.
I would first like to establish that a warrant, which is a legal requirement, was needed in this case. The information was not in any way speedy and had no means of stopping, or lessening a crime. The Prosecutor may not agree, but I beg the Court find that the issuance of a warrant be deemed a legal requirement, deserving of Compulsory Process. The basis for such a request is presented in the reasoning below.
The alleged conduct was not committed in an Officer’s presence.
This fact, as well as, the amount of time that elapsed between, the event, statement of accusation, and the serving of the warrant, left me wondering, what it was, the Police were trying to accomplish with the warrant. No-one was in harm’s way, nor anyone harmed. I do not know the accusations against me, but would find it difficult to believe that either my Significant-Other or my Daughter would give a statement attesting that I was ever, in the entirety of their Existences, a threat of harm to either one of them. These strange ‘legal conditions’ seem to be put in place
X Xxxxxxx’s Primary Statement XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX
since I was a youth to protect woman who, are honestly and seriously in harm’s way. Neither of the females, in my Home, have ever been in harm’s way conducive to my Existence. And, if indeed they were truly frightened, un-imaginably by me; they certainly were not a day or a week later, when the warrant was requested. The warrant did not qualify any safety or public good.
My Significant-Other informs me that she unintentionally made mention of the squabble, in the hearing of Campus Security, my Daughter and my Significant-Other felt compelled by those Authority Figures to give Statements to the Xxxxxxx Police, more than, 24hours to 1 week after the event took place. I believe my Significant-Other had given me both time-frames at 1 time or another. There was only 1 other fact that she shared with me, and I am thoroughly confused as to the truth of it. She did state invariably that the Police had charged me with “Unlawful Restraint,” which may be a legitimate charge, that I am un-familiar with. As I stated, this was the 1 fact that she was un-swayed upon, I had inquired several times, finding no reason for such a charge to be levied against me. The reason she had given was that, I sat on the trunk of the car, pleading that my Daughter stay. Honestly, Your Honor, I did not care if the charge, was illegal pogo stick jumping. I did care, however, that there was a warrant because of the accusations that had been made against me, and that the accusations were un-answered.
Now, my Daughter could easily be persuaded to exaggerate, my disciplinary measure, and has done so, to her friends, for the fear of being called a princess, and spoiled. She is not spoiled, but it is much closer to the truth than, I could ever be a threat or harm to her. Also, to the best of my knowledge there were no complaints from any neighbor, so what was the need for the warrant? It was merely a Father/Daughter dispute.
Xxxxxxx Criminal Procedure Xxxxxxx, does not provide for, “certain rights attendant the initiation of prosecution, such as the right to counsel.”
Xxxxxxx Criminal Procedure Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Practice Book § 36-6 permits an unserved warrant to be cancelled by either the prosecution or the court before the arrest is made.169 In State v. Pierrie, the Xxxxxxx Supreme Court read this and related provisions to mean that certain rights attendant the initiation of a prosecution, such as the right to counsel, do not attach until an arrest is made. 170 The signing of an arrest warrant “does not necessarily represent a commitment by the state to prosecute the defendant”; rather issuing of a warrant (as opposed to serving it and effecting an arrest) “ may be more accurately considered a prelude to a criminal prosecution, subject to amendment or cancellation as necessary, rather than the initiation of an adversarial judicial proceeding in its own right.
Your Honor, in reading the previous procedure, it seems that if there is behavior by the Police or the accused, solely because of the Existence of a warrant and/or its contents, that the arrest is effected. I received a phone call from the Xxxxxxx Police on September 11th, 2019 at 2:51 pm, but I was driving. I returned the call that same day at 3:56 pm, and was told that there was a warrant for my arrest, thereby serving the warrant and effecting the arrest. I went to the Xxxxxxx Police Station on September 12th to give my statement as to the events that unfolded on August 31st. Your Honor, even in the narrowest reading of this criminal procedure Xxxxxxx, when Officer Xxxxxxx informed me that he needed to take me to the back of the station for the purpose of an arrest, the ‘arrest was effected’ and warrant serve,’ as with the phone call. The arrest was also effected when my significant other informed me of charges and I typed a statement. So, in that/this case, I should have had ‘compulsory process,’ ‘due process,’ and as full a consideration for my statement as the
X Xxxxxxx’s Primary Statement XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX
accusers had for their statements, because the accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty. I was treated in full, guilty until proven innocent. My, the accused statement, should have been taken with the same custom and courtesy that the accuser’s statement was taken, unless choosing not to give a statement. When I arrived at the Police Station, I was due, the Right to give a statement and was not allowed to do so.
Your Honor I contend, hopefully with agreement that, to be a Police Officer one must be within the LAW and when stepping outside of the LAW, an Officer does not represent the State which imposed those Laws. When an Officer is outside of LAW, they can-not represent the Law which they are breaking and as such, when not adhering to the LAW the Police Officer has only the Rights of any civilian. So, when Officer Xxxxxxx refused my statement and initiated physical contact, he was only under the same protection of LAW as myself. In a somewhat paranoid state of mind. I have further communications regarding my paranoid state of mind. When I was denied ‘due process’ it only reinforced the thought that these Officers would take my life. I did push Officer Xxxxxxx when he grabbed my wrist. I simply wanted to get to public view, through the Police Station door and estimated that I could not do so. In that realization I submitted in total and full.
I also had/have a witness that I could have presented, who will testify to seeing nothing more than a misunderstanding between Father and Daughter. I pleaded to have my statement taken in legal defense of other statement’s accusations. It seems as though all of Xxxxxxx’s Attorneys demand that the accused not give a statement, forcing the exercise of the Right to Remain Silent. My statement could have and should have exonerated me from every aspect of conviction. Instead I was jailed without ever being heard. The State of Xxxxxxx only contends, that “certain rights attendant the initiation of a prosecution, such as the right to counsel, do not attach until an arrest is made.” In my case, all of my Rights to a defense, in requirements/processes of LAW, were made null, before the arrest, leaving me without any effective benefit of LAW or benefit of my innocence, including my Right to defend myself against all liable and defamation of character. My behavior was indeed in order on August 31st. At my Home on that night, some of the teen’s behavior was out of order, my Daughter in particular.
Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Constitution In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall have a right to be heard by himself and by counsel; to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation, to be confronted by witnesses against him, to have compulsory process to obtain witnesses in his behalf; to be released on bail upon sufficient security, except in capital offenses, where the proof is evident or the presumption great; and in all prosecutions by indictment or information, to a speedy, public trial by an impartial jury. No person shall be compelled to give evidence against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor shall excessive bail be required nor excessive fines imposed. No person shall be held to answer for any crime, punishable by death or life imprisonment, unless on a presentment or an indictment of a grand jury, except in the armed forces, or in the militia when in actual service in time of war or public danger.
The accusers, the Police, and the Judicial Authority, do form a ‘body of prosecution’ with the power and authority to deprive me of, life, liberty, and property and did so deprive me of, liberty and property, leaving me only with my life, and not even life, when one considers Family, life, as I do. I fully expected that those Officers, may very well, have intended to take my physical life. I do submit that I was not in the most-sound state of mind upon my behavior with Officer Xxxxxxx and the Xxxxxxx Police at the time that I attempted to give my statement. I have been diagnosed with
X Xxxxxxx’s Primary Statement XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX
Schizo-Affective Disorder. It appears that I was indeed more paranoid than the situation called for. I was however still rational and reasonable.
The catalyst of my elevated paranoia but reasonable fear was, in part, that my Daughter and Significant-Other had never acted with such indecisive malice, over a simple mis-understanding between myself and my Daughter. Both of their actions were puzzling to me. Said actions, came on the heels of an even bigger and more reasonable fear, which is the statements that I have made on my website, 5 months after filing Law-suits that implicated ‘Big-business’ and therefore business under it in perverting the legal system and some Government Officials with it. I accuse them of un-Constitutionally claiming the Rights of the Individual guaranteed by the 5th Amendment, 6th Amendment, 9th Amendment, 14th Amendment, and possibly other Amendments like them.
Six months after filing 2 civil-suits I was charged with 6 crimes in one week, including a cell-phone infraction, and on December 2nd, I was charged with another crime for events that took place, at the same time as, the first 6 charges, making the levy 7 charges for event that established themselves inside a span of 1 week. The Law-suits acknowledge that the American Government may claim Rights for itself, with the allowance for the redress of grievances, of the Individual American Citizen, when their Rights have been infringed upon by the Government. Only the Federal Government may assign Rights, because all of its Districts “shall have been previously ascertained by the LAW of the United States Constitution. State Governments therefore can-not claim an Individual Citizen’s Rights as their own, such as my Right to give a statement, before the arrest. The State Government may not claim these Rights, unless the Federal Government has done so. The State of Xxxxxxx intends to claim of my Rights granted to me, by the Xxxxxxx Constitution and by the United States of America Constitution, ‘compulsory process.’ I was left without the benefit of Law or any Rights for myself before the arrest, then in ‘effecting the arrest,’ I was in the narrowest reading left without, ‘due process’ of LAW, and could not in any way employ my ‘compulsory process,’ being, ‘due process.’
I have not to this day of December 20th, 2019, sat to give, and explain my statement of the events that took place on or about August 31st, 2019. If the Police, would have simply asked me, “Hey, what happened with you and your daughter?” I could have explained, with the support of a witness, that we simply had a Father/Daughter dispute. A dispute, blown way out of any proportion of the fact that there was no Existing danger or threat, but is as, has happened in all Families. We had a disagreement. That is the truth of it, and if the police had been satisfied of that, they may have never, filed for a warrant. Then in the case that they did file for a warrant. The Judicial Authority would have had both sides, the accused’s and the accuser’s statements, to make a decision and may have never signed any such warrant. Then even in the Judicial Authority signing the warrant, I could have been confronted with the accusations against me, and, I still, to this day have not been. The LAW does Exist, before, in, and after the Court-room, because the LAW never stops Existing only our recognition of it does.
With the lawyers I’ve talked to, I have found that they see no need of ‘compulsory process,’ for the defendant. Compulsory in the days of our Fore-Mothers and Fathers, demanded that the
X Xxxxxxx’s Primary Statement XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX
accused offer up a defense, so that there could be no tyranny, cited on the Government’s behalf. ‘Compulsory process’ Exists, now in Xxxxxxx law only for the accuser and prosecuting body that is formed by the accuser’s Government support, when the entirety of the Justice System only sits in Judgement of 2 parties the accuser and the accused. Could it be that ‘compulsory process’ being ‘due process,’ only applies to, half of the Justice System, and that the LAW only applies to some Citizens, some of the time, without consistency or equity for all of its Citizens. To take away the Right of the accused to know and defend against perhaps false accusations, is to allow the accuser to dictate the whole of the legal system, until the arraignment or trial. My Daughter was a scorned teen with her Mother, compelled by Law Enforcement to give statement that they didn’t understand, that in fact, they would not be able to retract said statements, in whole, nor redact any part of them. My Significant-Other and Daughter did try to retract the statements.
If these charges against me are not dismissed. It will set the precedent or has already set the precedent, that one Citizen may have another jailed if said Citizen, just decides that, they don’t particularly care for the other’s ethnicity, religion, political position or any other aspect of a person’s life. Their decision about that lack of caring for the targeted Citizen, becomes Law upon their accusation, be it, false or true. And, in this case, Your Honor, they will be able to deny all the Rights that I have been denied, even after “effecting the arrest” as in ‘Xxxxxxx Criminal Procedure Xxxxxxx’. In abandoning the LAW in such a way, who, may say that, once accused and incarcerated, never having, given a defense of myself, the accused will ever, need see, the light of day, liberty, personal property, or, worst of all, Family, and what is a life without these?
If thrown in jail, without the means or benefit of bail, one could be held for perhaps a year, before a trial, as has been done in Florida. And, with no money to pay Court fees and lawyers, whom are ‘business and corporate’ entities, how shall someone like me, file for the redress of grievances from a prison cell? Shall the ‘business of Law’ even provide one champion to a convict that perhaps no-one even knows about.
I don’t want to use procedural trickery or lawyered lies, nor do I want to offend Attorneys but some have suggested that I could lie. I want the truth to be known, as to the events that took place and are taking place. I believe in Justice and that the LAW can provide it to every Citizen, but that we must sensibly build on the Constitution and never abandon it. The truth of what happened on or about August 31st is my Daughter and myself had a misunderstanding of each-other’s positions.
My Daughter is still subject to my discipline, as she, still stays under our roof, I pay the payments on her car, and I pay for her cell-phone, her Mother’s cell phone, and her cousins cell phone. I also pay for her and her and her boyfriend’s television viewing. I contribute $500/mo to the mortgage, plus groceries. I pay for my Daughter’s and her Mother’s “Life-Lock” as well as, all expenses associated with the computer. I pay the monthly insurance upon all the Home’s appliances, to include the furnace and central air. I pay for my Great Nephew’s phone calls from his Mother, my Niece, who, is in prison. I am certain that though, my nephew’s Mother and Father have, both, served years in prison, that their Son, and my Great Nephew, may be steered clear of incarceration, with dedicated guidance, as I am willing to give. Finally, I’m the one who, pays the Children’s allowance, so that in the pursuit of education, they will still
X Xxxxxxx’s Primary Statement XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX
have, monetary means and work ethic, through chores. I have helped my Great Nephew and my Daughter’s cousin, to attain his driver’s license. He is 1 test away from attaining his GED and is seeking a more desirable hire-ability through the JET program, which increases his prospects for employment. He files one internet application a day, and we are now canvasing our local area with applications, because I may not be able to provide as dependable transportation for him, as I have for my Daughter. Without dependable transportation he may have to work locally. I feel confident that my Daughter, her Mother, and my Great Nephew who, lives with us, would testify that, my being in jail would be dis-adventitious to all of us as well as our local, State, and National communities. If I am jailed, I will leave a mountain of debt that I pay monthly without fail. My Daughter did not realize the gravity of her and her Mother’s actions in giving their statements, compelled by Law Enforcement at Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx University.
Last but not least of all, my bail was set at $7,500.00 on September 12th, 2019, me having never missed a court date, indicates “Excessive Bail.” I did pay $750.00 to be released from custody, with a bail bonds-person. I’d never, had a “Failure to Appear,” until September 27th, when I was taken to Harrington Impatient Care in Massachusetts. I did not want to go to an impatient status.
Least of all, I did break an object that I have partial monetary ownership of, and I am able to repair/replace that object. To put an object into dis-repair is not illegal. When asking my significant other if she wanted me to repair the door, she stated, “no,” because the door is part of the continuous updating, modifying, and modernization, that the both of us attend to. Because it is not illegal to break a replaceable object that, one is partial owner of, with the countenance of any and all other owners of the aforementioned object, I ask that such an act be found “immaterial” in my case, and if being found, “material evidence” it should be a separate case of vandalism, as brought by any other owners of the aforementioned object. So, then the breaking of the object is irrelevant, or separate of the charges brought against me. If I can have such evidence deemed “immaterial,” I was charged for discipling my adult aged Daughter whom, is in no way, as independent as she believes herself to be.
In conclusion, Your Honor, I ask to have all charges against me, dropped, dismissed, or nollied, including ‘Operating Under the Influence.’ It was a suicide attempt, due to the cruel, and total disregard for the fact, that I know my Daughter, better than the Dean of Students, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, the University Psychologist, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, and all the Law Enforcement who, stopped me from addressing my Daughter’s foreign, ‘emotional, and Psychological distress.’ By all modern means of medicine, I couldn’t have the ability to drive that car, because the 420 prescription grade medication pills that I swallowed, while believing that I could not and would not be able to get to, nor see my Daughter any more, those pills, should have killed me. I simply should not have been able to, and had no intention to, drive a car. There was no accident, nor even a blemish on the motor vehicle. When the Police apprehended me, that week.
For the charge of ‘Assault on a Public Safety Officer’: The Police did ‘serve and effect the arrest’ multiple times and were outside of the LAW in denying my statement in ‘due process,’ ‘compulsory process.’ When a body of prosecution with the full power of prosecution aside of sentencing, invokes those powers to deny “Liberty, Property, and Life,” outside of prison the accused must have some defense against those powers. It is not America nor its Constitution that would allow the accused to be jailed indefinitely pending some power’s interpretation of ‘speedy.’ It is not even of the Xxxxxxx State Constitution. Officer Xxxxxxx was not inside the requirements, and processes of LAW, that allow him to be a Police Officer, when he initiated physical contact. If there is any Police Protocol to deescalate an intense turn of events, Officer Xxxxxxx, utilized none of them, Instead, he denied me ‘due process,’ in this case ‘compulsory process,’ and initiated a dialog seemingly, with sarcasm and threat. When I said, “You’re going to put 2 bullets in the back of head, Officer Xxxxxxx didn’t say, “You have a Right to give Your statement,” nor would he take the typed statement from my hand. He didn’t say, “Would You like to see the statements against You?” He didn’t say, “Myke, You seem anxious, I need You calm down a little.” He didn’t say, “I know You believe we’re going to hurt You but no-one here is going hurt You, I still need Your compliance. Officer Xxxxxxx, in a seemingly sarcastic tone, said only, “Nah, we’re not going to shoot You.” Since I was not being allowed to give a statement in my defense of immediately punishable accusations, I could not trust the Officers intentions. There was mostly the fear of retaliation for statements made on my website. If this charge is allowed to stand, every Citizen will be at the will and mercy of other Citizens. Jailed and held at nothing more than a malicious statement.
X Xxxxxxx’s Primary Statement XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX
For the charge of ‘Disorderly Conduct’: I do not know the accusations against me so I can-not know if a/any neighbors filed complaints. I have tried to maintain a relationship to them in such a way that they could express any disturbance on my part to me, unabashed. I would, of course, have apologized consistent to the civil and enjoyable interactions, I’ve had with all of them. I have only asked one of the two nearest neighbors if they had been bothered by a ruckus in my yard. He exclaimed that he could recall no such ruckus. I believe it would be inappropriate to knock on all of my neighbor’s doors asking if they had given statements against me. My Daughter’s behavior was in need of reprimand that night and that is all that took place on my part.
I have served and am serving my Country, Community, and Family and indeed was serving these when correcting my Daughter’s behavior on August 31st, 2019. My incarceration would cripple my Home without my income and emotional support. I too would be crippled without the need of a Loving Home. I have strove to support Family, mine 1st, then other’s any time that I could. I have dedicated myself to being a benefit to Society, not a detriment. This has never been more true than trying raise the best Xxxxxxx, and American Citizen that I could raise. In college we were introduced to the terminology ‘War on the Home.” It’s the inability to keep the 1st, 2nd, and sometimes 3rd Family Homes. My 1st Family Home of 31 years with my Significant-Other has undergone a folly of detriment and circumstance that I haven’t seen another Home make it through. We maintain the support, Love, and respect for each-other and each-other’s appropriate relations outside of the Home. My Home and those in it cause me to believe and strive for an even better Home, in a better Community, in a better Nation. If I am abruptly separated from my under these conditions, I don’t even know what hope will look like. Please, allow my Home and other Xxxxxxx Homes be allowed minor disagreements, in a best effort to secure, and never drive apart the American Home.
Thank You, Your Honor,
This is the motion of Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Scroll Down
Statement of Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx as to the Events
Taking Place on August 31st, 2019
My Daughter and I commonly raised tones with each-other, but only upon the issues of chores and education, every now and then about internet safety. This short-lived dispute on or about August 31st, was over the socio-economic superiority complex that my Daughter, whom is one of the accusers, displayed with 4 or 5 of her friends. With the way my Daughter was raised this should not have been a disagreement. The display started with a total disregard for any gratitude toward my Great Nephew for starting the fire that they were all sitting around. Then they proceeded to exempt him from the camp-fire conversation. My Great Nephew, and my Daughter’s cousin, is from lower socio-economic means, than all of my Daughter’s crowd. He has sometimes been, the lowest echelon of Societal Existence, in his Homelessness. Our Family is by no means wealthy, our Home is the smallest on our block, and sits on a modest ¼ acre lot, but with, my Great Nephew, having no-where else to go, my Significant-Other and myself took him into ours and our Daughter’s Home. My Daughter and her friends spoke only of their mutual High-School experiences at first, and I held my tongue as my Great Nephew sat quiet and un-touchable to them. They changed the subject temporarily to a, ‘television show’ they all had in common, about sextuplets, giving that topic about 30 seconds among them. Then they moved right on to their collegiate pursuits and successes/acceptances. My Great Nephew sat alienated. I tried to enter the conversation in hopes of getting my Great Nephew involved some-how. I had shared stories and company with all of my Daughter’s friends, some of them quite frequently. I stated that there are various avenues to getting into college, I, myself, had to enter by way of the military. One of my Daughter’s friends, floored me with shock, when stating in a snobby chuckle, “And, here You are…” I could only assess, of the statement, that she was speaking of my Societally insignificant role as a homekeeper, with fairly insignificant monetary means and dwelling. I said nothing to her about her statement, because she is not my daughter. Finally, I did just come right out and say to my Daughter, that I thought they were being shitty to my Great Nephew, who, hadn’t even the incentive to finish High-School. My Daughter lashed back at me and darted into the house. I followed her in assertion of my answer to her statement that, “Everyone has an equal opportunity to better themselves.” I wanted to point out to her that some Children have had no example of self-betterment, but are raised around those whom, thrive on the degradation of self and those around them, including the Children. I wanted to explain that, some people have settled for having no valuable place in Society and sometimes appropriately credit that same Society with the deficiencies in Human Existence. My Daughter, never being at fault, in her mind, for any wrong-doing, raised her voice as I raised mine. I could not get her to hear, that ‘some’ are born to more opportunity, Love and Family than others. That same aforementioned ‘some,’ is a group that she belongs to when compared to my Great Nephew. When she could not even let me finish a statement, I hit her bed-room door. The back seam of the flimsy and ‘soon to be’ replaced fixture came undone, not so much as to even effect the opening and closing of it, in any way. If I couldn’t make her hear my point about superiority complexes, I could make her remember how adamant I was about such exclusive and artificial self-images and feelings. I will not tolerate my Daughter degrading a silent party’s self-esteem and self-worth, so that she may feel like the better of the two. She learned no such maneuvering from me.
She was in much more distress when leaving than what the Father/Daughter squabble called for. She has always been taught that I have no higher Human Love than that for her, no-matter the issue. And, she is familiar with our disagreements, due to school-work and chores, as she grew-up, eventually taking both values into her own handling. She even impressed me with, straight A’s, one quarter of her Senior year. By the time she was 18, I no longer spoke to her about chores or School. In the after-math of confused feelings about what exactly had taken place, I suggested to my Great Nephew that he could have made more of an effort to join the conversation. My Daughter went to her car, which I pay for and which is in my name. I sat in the passenger seat and pleaded for her not to go. She had just made a desperate statement, saying, “I have to go home now, after being on campus only 1 week. She said that she could never come back, followed by I’m never coming Home again. I had no doubt that in her mind she believed what she was saying. I expressed again that the argument was no big deal, but for some reason she was sure that it was. Her Mother, and my Significant-Other gave, her the keys to the Mother’s vehicle. She would not hear any apology, when commonly she would. She was more distraught than I had ever seen her. As she pulled out of the driveway, I sat on the trunk of the car as she sped away in which case I jumped to the pavement. One of her dear friends, whom was not at the campfire that night, went to find her and give her, her car.
After reading several hostile and un-true texts, I call the Dean of Students. Campus Security had denied me access to her, when giving me the phone number to the Dean. I asked the Dean, if she knew of any Freshman Hazing going on at the Campus, in which she replied, “What’s Hazing?” Unsatisfied with that response I went to the Campus a second time. I was unsatisfied because the Dean certainly should have heard of hazing. The second time, avoiding campus security, I sat outside of my Daughter’s room and quietly tried to get her to consider coming back Home at any point. My Daughter was headed off by another student whom looked naturally gothic, and completely dis-illuminated. She spoke to me with contempt when expressing how abnormal I was. I could have just ignored the situation completely to see if she would come home in her own time. I did not turn to ignorance, because my Baby-Girl was behaving as she never had in 18 years. My statement as to our Homes Psychological and Sociological raising of my Daughter. After several ignored phone calls to the University Psychologist, then the Dean, as well as the armed denial to see my Daughter on several attempts and 1 Police supervised visit, I started to believe that she was not coming Home. When convinced of it, at the last encounter, with Campus Security I attempted suicide. I have never before attempted suicide.
Insight to Reason for Paranoia and
Possible Conflict of Interest
XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX
Your Honor, dates, times, history, and monetary means, suggests that I was indeed a target, perhaps for my un-popular views on my website, HomeKeeperU.com. There are claims corruption and perverting the American Legal System on the part of ‘Big-business’ and some Government Officials. Perhaps I was distinguished as different than other Citizens because of my on-going Law-suits. Though, the Government may claim my Individual Rights and must allow for redress of that/those grievances, business in the form of Corporate Medicine and Treatment has ‘NO’ Right to assume the Rights granted to me as an American Citizen. I could be a target because I am trying to finish and publish the “Spherical Set E-LAW Human Earth.” The “Spherical Set E-LAW Human Earth,” deduces Human LAW from the LAWS of Existence, and it deduces them right down to the need of the Human Element and their perception of their Rights to Exist. I’ve also uncovered a mathematical base that begins with 7 distinct ‘zeros’ not just ‘1’. My 2 civil suits are tied in to the aforementioned works. Prospecting why, I may be a target, and have the, paranoia that accompanies it, may leave someone thinking, “Yeah, well, if his intellectual work is so good, then why isn’t he in some fancy University or Space Aged Corporation?” There’s one more place You could find someone with my claims of intellectual material, and that is the looney bin. I am not crazy, in-sane, or un-sane, but I do, sometimes have difficulty in explaining some of my thoughts to others in a way that they can appreciate. I wound up in a hospital in 2003/2004 when I wrote the “Umbrella Set E-LAW Human Earth.” It is the predecessor of the “Spherical Set E-LAW Human Earth,” and if I get the chance to finish it, it will be much more understandable than the “Umbrella Set E-LAW Human Earth.” Another thought is, that if I’m deemed incapacitated in a hospital or prison the work may go to someone else. When in college I had the highest or close to the highest GPA in the school. It was a 4.0. It was almost 2 years with 115 to, a little more than, 120 credits per/year. The work I’m doing now is what I would have completed had I not dropped out of school with Gulf War Illness and Schizo-Affective Disorder. All of that just to say someone(s) else may have taken an interest in me and my 2 Law suits, claiming that ‘Business’ can-not have the Rights of the Individual Citizen. There are a couple of more indicators that may have drawn the wrong kind of attention. At this point, I’m not sure that I’ll ever know.
I hope for more investigation into the civil matters, which may reveal why I have been discriminately targeted in criminal degradation. I’ve now been spread so thin, as to filing fees for the civil matters, bail, and the need for an attorney in the criminal proceedings, that I’ve been reduced to begging for the monetary backing to pursue, in every case/suit that I am currently involved with, the Individual Rights of the American Citizen. These Rights must be acknowledged and utilized or no-good will come of it for America and for the World.
I explain discriminately by, all 3 criminal charges, which in total, of what’s been dropped, 3 charges, what’s been paid, 1 traffic violation has amounted to 7 charges during 1 week in September. The charges and the 2 civil suits, having $505.00 filing fees, share the ‘Rights of the Individual’ as a common denominator. The numerator is the ease of influence by ‘Big-
Statement of Paranoia XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX
businesses’ ties to Global, Federal, and State legal-systems. I believe the nature of the civil suits may contribute to the difficulty in retaining legal representation. Business that incorporates, the Atomic Age, Computer Age, Space Age, Information Age, and the Age of Enlightenment/Education, into what can be called the mass-appeal of our Technology Age is threatened needlessly by my observances of ‘Big-business’ claiming the Individual Citizen’s Rights. I want not for 1 billionaire to lose 1 penny and have expressed on my website HomeKeeperU.com that they need not. But, they can-not be allowed the ‘Absolute Power’ that comes with claiming the ‘Rights of the Individual.’ It is an Age in which ‘Big-business’ does not have to share or expose themselves based on the Individual’s Rights to privacy, they would have it, so as not, to be obliged to any National Government, but instead assume a Government capacity. They possess the ability to sever any Citizens Rights to live industriously, with employment termination and no account of reason for said termination. That is ‘Absolute Power over the individual. We as Americans have not even the Right to know the cutting-edge technology of the Age, based on ‘Big-businesses’ artificial Right to privacy, a Right preserved for the Individual Citizen for centuries.
If my suits, which are still ‘Small Claims’ amounts make it to the Supreme Court, I intend to redress the grievance of ‘Business-rights/Government,’ but I’m not absolutely sure that a ‘Small Claims’ can be heard by the Supreme Court. I don’t know that I would pursue the claims beyond those amounts. The civil suits are now at the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
This brings me back to, Xxxxxxx Criminal Procedure 1-1:9.5. I stressed to the Police, that I would like them to take my statement and tried to hand them my typed statement. I was filled with anxiety, as to their intentions. Their intentions when telling my Significant-Other that I was being charged with, ‘Unlawful Restraint,’ that I believe was never true but it is what they instructed to my Significant-Other. I don’t know Law Enforcement’s intentions, when instructing to my Significant-Other and my Daughter to file such needless statements. I don’t know the intentions of the University’s and Police’s one show of compassion in an otherwise complacent climate and environment, when I was frantic over my Daughter’s belief that she could never come Home, and self-perpetuation of that belief. I was disturbed by the cruel and Psychologically unredeemable, to Home, values and practices, of my Daughter, and the idle posture of the Dean of Students, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx. When I asked the Dean if she “was aware of any Freshman hazing,” the Dean replied, “What’s hazing…?’ I’m unsure of the charismatic and understanding way, Xxxxxxx Police Officer, Sergeant Xxxxxxx implied and conveyed, “It happens to us all, get over it.” Also, mentioning the totally asinine, and condescending way, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx University’s School Psychologist, ignored my emotional trauma from my Daughter’s anti-psychological behavior, as I point out in my “Psychological Statement.
All of that is just a little reason to distrust the intentions of the Xxxxxxx Police Department, who, were so concerned about the safety of my female companions, as to take out a warrant for my arrest. The same Police Officers made no show, to my Home of residence, to check on the safety of my Significant-Other’s constant dwelling amongst my total lack of agitation for my Loved ones. I did however have agitation with the lack of ‘due process,’ and anyone’s concern about my statement.
Statement of Paranoia XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX
I do not sue, nor do I believe am I allowed to sue, Government Entities, only ‘Big-business’ entities posing in Government capacities in regard to my Existence and Rights. I am suing one of them for only the, 4-digit figure $3,500, and the other, for $1,500. I also, just paid $1010.00 dollars in filing fees, to keep pursuing mine and Your, ‘Individual Rights.’ How much are they paying Attorneys not to pay-out the $3,500 and the $1,500? They are separate suits but under the corporate shield they do not have to announce their identity in Court and for all I know could be the same entity, yesterday, today, or tomorrow.
The Police never had to see my accusation that “Big-business’ and business under it are perverting our legal system and some Government Officials, in claiming the Individuals’ Rights.” The same Rights that allow us to refuse pills that strip us of all, motivation and will to succeed at any-thing Among the avalanche of Rights, dis-allowed, is ‘Big-business’ out of legal maneuvers, that could really claim that same illusion/delusion of a protected Right to not be medicated, even as I type. ‘Corporate Medicine,’ says I have no Right to stay on a medication that really works for me, even among all ludicrous and provably desperate assertions that I am not stable on the medication. A medication that is statistically and racially kept from minorities. I was able to print out the only study result, in all of my Google searches, that even addressed the issue.
Xxxxxxx PD may have never read this motion, but I was in the service, and I recognize those who, were just following orders. I am going to post this motion on my website HomeKeeperU.com, and there still may be a few who, know, “Hey, orders are orders.” Therefore, I do not feel safe when going to the police station nor do I feel safe even in my own Home. I will continue to convey to the public, that their and my Individual Rights are at stake, and on the grill of ‘Big-business’ and business under it. I will publish, that the Government has an inherent and now, expressed conflict of interest, due to, ‘Big-business’ and business under it, providing the industrial Existences, that Government Officials enjoy. It is also ‘Big-business’ and therefore business under it that will provide the Attorney that I am now trying to hire. Of course, that representation will be in ‘conflict of interest.’ These communications are not ‘abuse’ as stated in the Xxxxxxx Constitution, Xxxxxxx: Every Citizen may freely speak, write and publish his sentiment on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that liberty. My writings about the ‘Individual Rights,’ being the last American hold against ‘Business Government’ and the fall of the American Constitutional Government, are in no way, like, “Shouting ‘Fire’ in a crowded movie theatre”. My writing’s always pay respect to our Government and their needs to govern us. I speak of the importance of the structure, and never allowing it to fall, though some changes must be made, if the United States Government and the Xxxxxxx Government are to escape the grasp of ‘Big-Business Government.’ I write only truth, and if there is speculation on my part, I announce that it is speculation. No, my writings can-not be dubbed ‘abuse.’ If there can be a metaphor to ‘Fire,’ my website, HomeKeeperU.com instructs how the American Citizen, may within LAW and Legal Systems, calmly subdue the blazes. These issues take discussion and a lot of it. HomeKeeperU.com also points out the American Citizen’s Right to walk away from the ‘Fire,’ if they believe it is adequately being attended to. I feared for my life walking into that Police Station, and Officer Sharky did and said nothing to deescalate, diminish, or address the
Statement of Paranoia XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX
tension/anxiety. When I expressed that I was afraid they were going to put 2 bullets in the back of my head, Officer Sharky replied, “Nah, we’re not going to shoot you.” Which are the last words some American Citizens have heard after going to the back of a police station. He could have said, “Sure we’ll take Your statement, or would You like to read the accusations against You?” He could have just said, “Hey Myke, Your stressing. Let’s get You to calm it down a little. No-one here is going to hurt You.” Because, he informed me that he was serving a warrant, he did effect the arrest, the same as the phone call effected the arrest. In actuality Sergeant Xxxxxxx, effected the arrest when he told my Significant-Other that I was brought up on charges, which is the equivalent of saying there’s a warrant for Your arrest. He effected the arrest as soon as I typed my statement and headed to the station, only to give my statement. Having no ‘compulsory process’ ‘due process,’ only made my fears worse.
I only express some details about my civil suits, so that Your Honor, will understand that there could be contributing factors to the criminal proceedings against me, by influences that I can-not specifically point out. Also, Your Honor, I would like You to understand that my fear at the Police Station is certainly in some way grounded.
Thank You, Your Honor,
Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx
Signed: _________________________________________________ Date: _______________________
The following may come up in any discussion of the issues:
6th Amendment
In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against them; except/accept that any witness be in regulated, or un-regulated posture or irregulated danger; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in their favor and to have the assistance of counsel for their defense.
Regulated, is a set and standard public schedule, in which compulsory and non-compulsory witnesses may be attained by the accused.
So Your town may have a schedule, say Monday, Wednesday, and Friday that the accuser may have access to the same witnesses and those places from 7am to 12pm while the accused has access from 1pm to 9pm then the accuser has from 10pm to 12am. Then switch the schedule for the other 4 days and following week. Of course it would be best to have State and Federal alignment to Your town’s schedule, checkable on every cell-phone.
Un-regulated, is a flexible schedule for witnesses of the accuser and/or the accused.
You may have the case that doesn’t matter if You assess the same witnesses at the same time or which-ever time, You are able to agree, on different than scheduled times.
Irregulated, is when there is no safe schedule for witnesses of the accuser and/or the accused.
5th Amendment.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb, except when the individual can-not present progress in their Life and/or station since they were convicted or placed on probation. In presenting such evidence an individual is presenting their willingness to change for the good of Society. An individual shall not be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against theirself, nor deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of LAW; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.
It is the LAW that previous cases not be used against You in a Court of LAW, because it is being tried twice for the same crime no matter how much or little relevance You give the previous crimes. So to assess the accused’s value and commitment to Society, we may simply evaluate the accused’s entire life since the last conviction. Then they are not being tried for the same crime but we are not being naïve to a life chosen for crime. A person, rather all of us persons in “We the People” are worth investigating the life since the crime.
This next paragraph is from the criminal proceedings that I am currently involved with. Following the paragraph is the solution from at least 1 problem that could arise in LAW, if the Courts hold to it.
Your Honor, Mr./Mrs./Ms. Attorney, ‘Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury,’ I contend, hopefully with agreement that, to be a Police Officer one must be within the LAW and when stepping outside of the LAW, an Officer does not represent the State which imposed those Laws. When an Officer is outside of LAW, they can-not represent the Law which they are breaking and as such, when not adhering to the LAW the Police Officer, can be arrested by another Officer, within the LAW. So, an Officer outside of the LAW, has only the Rights of any civilian. When Officer Sharky refused my statement and initiated physical contact, he was only under the same protection of LAW as myself. In a somewhat paranoid state of mind. I have further communications regarding my paranoid state of mind. When I was denied ‘due process’ it only reinforced the thought that these Officers would take my life. I did push Officer Sharky when he grabbed my wrist. I simply wanted to get to public view, through the Police Station door and estimated that I could not do so. In that realization I submitted in total and full.
Problem: The Police can’t be expected to be within every facet of LAW/Legal, every moment of the day. They couldn’t spit on the sidewalk and make a legitimate arrest.
Solution: They must be within the ‘Point of LAW.’
So, If, a Law Enforcement Agent smoked a joint with old high school friends, a day before a $30,000 cocaine bust. The Law Enforcement Agent would not be in the point of LAW, and it would be a good bust. But, if the Law Enforcement Agent was stoned or smoking a joint during the bust, that ‘one’ Agent would be outside of the ‘Point of LAW. The Agent lays down their vesture of Law Enforcement and is counted as a civilian. The bust would, then, be bad.’ If the Agent controversially shot a ‘drug dealer’ and it can be ‘proven beyond a reasonable doubt,’ that the joint that they smoked the day before was a contributing factor to the decision to fire his/her side-arm. The bust is still good but the shooting is not.
If an Officer can be outside of the ‘Point of LAW,’ when making an arrest. They could be receiving personal profit from drug dealing, while arresting drug dealers. They could engage in rape, while arresting someone for resisting. They can beat a Grandmother, with her Grandchild, down in the street and a civilian could not stop the un-LAWFUL behavior.
Business Rights Concerns
The claim that, it is absurd to allow an individual the Right to dress as they please, in the workplace is easily cleared by utilizing the “Climate and Environment of the Shared Reality of Numbers.” With consideration of the business, climate, and environment, then the community, town/city, State and so-on. Either may hold accountability, the individual or the climate and environment.
The claim of the Right to fire or terminate an individual’s ability to Exist industrially, without the access to land and the knowledge of how to provide from that land for the individual and/or the individual(‘s’) family from any land, is resolved as follows.
First, the individual maintains Individual Rights as a representative of (a) business(es) and that business may empower its employee with the additional Right, in the ability to terminate an employee. The employee to be terminated retains the “Right to Exist” and practice individual Rights. A Consult may be formed of 12 individuals, 6 chosen by the business/company and 6 chosen by the, individual to be terminated. Upon a deadlock/gridlock, the individual may choose 2 of the 12 and the business/company may choose 1 and the 3 declare a decision by majority rule. If the individual or any of Consult appear 3 times together the business/company may reverse the 1 and 2 of the deadlock/gridlock decision, having 2 of the final 3 chosen by the business/company and 1 by the, individual to be terminated, upon that termination all of those that can be associated to mutiny may be fired as well. Any being fired may challenge in a Court of Law. If the Court finds that an individual should not have been terminated that individual is entitled 3 years at that same business/company with no behavior deemed terminal to employment and the behavior tried is protected. Within the 3 years the business/company may find the individual employment of equal or better pay with the same tolerance and company longevity as the employing business/company. The fact that the individual employee took their termination to trial is protected information.
I will not be adding to HomeKeeperU, until there is progress on any of its initiatives, I am jailed, or clear of imprisonment. If I am jailed I hope to another inform You of the event. In that case I will leave HomeKeeperU.com on the internet for as long as I possibly can. If I am not jailed I will report back with the “Proposal for the Occupational Parenting Amendment, Midnight’s Perspective Math, or the completion of the Spherical Set E-LAW Human Earth.
If these transmissions have been reaching You at least some part of the ‘powers that be’ have allowed for that to take place. It is in those powers that I have and will place my hope.
GOD Bless You and Until next time, keep your homes well.
Welcome Occupational Parenting Health and Happiness The Human Element The Perceivable Universe The Environment Word Play Conclusion Glossary In The Kitchen Pets Tips Cleaning Tips Parenting Tips Blog