Though, I would normally call working blogs for HomeKeeperU.com, WORK. It just seems like all the legal I’m doing ‘at this time’ seems a lot more like work than work. I’m going to take the next 20 minutes to 1 hour laid back, or as much as I can achieve of “laid back”. Here are some quotes, some of them irrefutable or LAW, at the bottom of the page. There’s going to be just a touch of WORK in here, because sometimes there’s just no escaping it. The following is a comment I received, when I was still getting comments; one of the last of them. The comment is in a ‘light violate’, and the response in a ‘forest green’. The point of the ‘comment and response’ is to exemplify exactly what, it is that, I say about Copyright. Now, some of these quotes will be pretty good and I’ll just keep adding to them. If You see them else-where in any money-making ploy, You will know some, ‘probably un-imaginative’ degenerate, took my ‘shit’. But, if it is as should be, and the only workable answer, is that, the ‘publish button’ needs to be an automatic Copyright. Any other answer will become far to complex to fit into a Court-room. If I’m not mistaken legal states or used to state that an informal Copyright consists of writing the letter ‘C’ and drawing a circle around it ©. Then the work was informally but Officially Copyrighted. Clicking the ‘publish button’ is by common-sense the same. This will be moved to a blog post instead of a page very shortly. Here’s the comment.
| I am a student in Vancouver Community College’s Administrative Assistant program. One of our assignments is to prepare a PowerPoint presentation that includes images. While I was doing research for my presentation, I discovered your informative website. There is a picture of a Christmas Party on your web page that would greatly enhance my presentation. Will you grant me permission to use this photo in my homework? This PowerPoint presentation is for educational purposes only; it will not be used for any commercial purpose. Please let me know soon as I need to finish my presentation by Wednesday, June 26, 2019. If I should contact someone else for permission, I would appreciate it if you would tell me who to contact.
Thank you very much. Best regards, Lorraine I find it difficult to believe that You ask permission for all presentation photo usage, but even if not, point well taken, and I do not own 99% of the photos on HomeKeeperU.com. I try to stay away from the ones that are specially marked for no usage. I copyright my website in the hope of copyright, never anticipating that I would try to claim a picture that someone else posted on the internet. I believe the only reasonable and possible way for the internet to work is that You own that which is fist posted, by You. In the case where the Child tried to sue the Parents to, take photos of the the Child down, of course the Child should have won, but the Parents own the copyright if ever owning the pictures. Thank You for You inquisitiveness. I hope I wasn’t a Dick. The other account of reason is, the adult comes up to me and can prove their rights and, with-in an acceptable amount of provability, ‘say like if’, the person who is the, ‘HKU Baby’ or either of them on the Welcome page, says, “I want money.” I believe that person is entitled money “IF”, I am making money from the website, which I am not. If they, ask me to take it down, of course I would. Thanks again for the great question. |
So, I think maybe I should work on my wording, but if You did understand the response, You see how sensible and Court-room worthy it is. I think I may have gotten a little too cocky in my response, rubbing my hands together, with a clap, as if I was all done. For some-one like Lorrain, using it for work, it can be construed as income from the use of the picture or other, ‘should be’, Copyrighted material. A Data-base just for Copyright, or the ‘Copyright-Check Registry’, should be on the internet where everyone knows how to find it. If You use already published material, You simply enter it into the registry, by its ‘CCR’ number with, permission, contact information, fee, and account for deposit. Of course, there would have to be way to manually ‘CCR’ the material if You post or up-load from work or a friend’s computer. I ‘m hesitantly going rub these hands together. The first quote in green is actually LAW, meaning it’s always true and includes “Spherical-turnaround”, which may have a more complete definition than this that follows but I’m working on it. The definition is kind of long if You’d just like to skip to the leisure of the “quotes”.
Spherical-turnaround: is 1. In the American language all simple statements have an extreme where the opposite or undoing of the statement takes place. Every simple statement has “Spherical-turnaround by another simple but most time complex statement e.g. The dog is black. (“Spherical-turnaround”, The dog is pink), with a back coat). By including the pink segment of the comment with the black segment of the comment, the statement is no longer simple. Anther example would be e.g. Donald Trump is the President. (“Spherical-turnaround”, Donald Trump is a criminal) Our legal system doesn’t allow a person to be both criminal and President, when spitting on the sidewalk is against the Law. Time may be included in the terms of “Spherical-turnaround” e.g. of a terminally ill patient in her last days, That man is lively. (“Spherical-turnaround” That’s a dead-man). Our language is built in such a way so as to be confusing for a computer, or those who think in literal terms. Because “Spherical-turnaround” is true, the ‘letter of the LAW is Constitutionally inferior to the ‘Spirit of the LAW’. A skilled linguist may interpret anything they choose in the ‘letter of the LAW’. 2. In the progression of all events there will come events, perspectively equal to their origin. 3. Any ‘acute angle’ leaving a ‘point of reference’ must eventually assume enough perspective space to arrive at the ‘perceivable or un-perceivable’ ‘original point of reference’, or forward of the ‘original point’ while simultaneously referencing some point behind the original point, which is equal to the distance from the ‘original reference point’ to the 2nd ((1i-) or, (‘any or all’ new forward referenced point(s) of the ‘forward most’ degree of any angle)), charted or not. The ‘forward most’ portion, or degree, of the angel may have sustained enough change that the original point may or ‘may not’ be reference-able as the ‘original reference point’ or (2nd 1i-) forward point. When the ‘acute angle’ assumes enough Space/space to fulfill 180° by the ‘original reference point’ the ‘largest degree’ and ‘original reference point’ will Exist in the same Space/space, effecting the ‘forward most distance’, the ‘original point of reference’ and create a ‘hind most’ ‘largest degree’, moving in the same direction of the ‘original angle’. The ‘event line’, when event is part of the equation, will move in the opposite direction of the ‘hind most’ ‘largest degree’. There needn’t be the experience of ‘2 dimensional Space/space except at the ‘original point of reference’. 4. When an angle is obtuse, and the distance between the ‘arms of the angle’ becomes so much larger than the distance, to that same segment, that the distance no longer Exists, in what has been called a 3 dimensional State, and the appearance of the point or some distance behind the point becomes a part of the ‘original point of reference’ or the reference part of it. “Spherical-turnaround” example: A diagonal may be formed from the ‘2nd reference’, of the ‘reference point’, to the ‘reference point’ or a sphere inside a sphere or a big circle over a smaller circle or ‘vice versa’. The 360° center of both circles/spheres are in perfect alignment, but the larger circle/sphere has a lager degree. So, the smaller circle/sphere or (original reference) at 359°aligns to ‘360° left hand limit’ of the degree on the (2nd reference) or larger circle/sphere. That same ‘360° left hand limit’ with the larger 360° ‘point of reference’, on the lager circle/sphere creates a diagonal segment to the 360 ° center of the smaller circle/sphere or (original reference) the equivalent of 1° difference between the larger and smaller circles/spheres, or 359° to 360° on the smaller (original reference) corresponding to the 360° center and ‘left hand limit’ of that same degree on the larger circle/sphere. So, the ability to form an angle of 179° of the semi-circle/hemisphere, opposite the forward most portion, or degrees, of the ‘original angel’ demonstrates how depth can create a new opposite angle in “Spherical-turnaround”. When enough Space/space is assumed by the ‘largest degree’ of the ‘angle’, and fulfills 180° by the ‘original reference point’ the Space/space, of ‘largest degree’ of the ‘original reference point’ and the ‘original reference point’ will be the same Space/space. This is due to, the un-perceivable motion of the ‘largest degree’ of the ‘angle’, of the ‘original reference point’ and the ‘largest point of the angle’ toward each-other, in paradox and the utilization of 2 actual spaces. Also forward of the 180° of Space of the “original reference point’ a reverse angle paradox to the 2nd (1i-) of the original reference. With enough Time and Space we increase the mass of the traveler by ( (1+2i-)=2)), meaning every Dimensional Space sends 1 traveler but receives (2). The original ‘angle’ may have sustained enough change that the original point may or ‘may not’ be reference-able as the ‘original reference point’. 5. The point at which any diameter or radius line in a sphere is redirected along the surface of the sphere to its polar-cap or any pole in between. 6. The point at which any 2 polar caps touch. 7. The reason behind our Space/Time curvature. It is the manifestation of both “Repulsive and Contact (attractive) Gravity. It is within the existence of the ‘Human Element’ or ‘Elements of the Human-Kind’ that the curvature my be relieved. The future of Space-flight will both liner and curvature addresses with exactly the same co-ordinance.
These definitions if true, are held to angles of sustenance/substance of the Human Perception. This means that it may not always be true for Humans if we stay around long enough and keep evolving intellectually an Infinite Eternal motion forward and any direction, may replace ‘Spherical-turnaround. ‘Spherical-turnaround is like a Universal insurance-policy limiting the travel of those who, may harm/disrupt the Universe’s Perfect Order.
Sorry about the long hopefully well thought-out definition. The definition may seem impossible to understand. I barely understood my self in rereading but drawing a picture would clear this up, even when the distances are unimaginable along with the amount of Space, in drawing we could cheat the process. I will try to work towards programs with graphic demonstrations. Objectively, what I write about with the angles should not take place. Here’s the quotes.
“The fewer the tolerances, any object has the weaker the object is, but the object with no intolerance is not tolerable to objects with limited tolerances.”
This next one kind of goes with the first.
“Be ‘self-conquered’ and remain ‘un-concquered”.
“The Scientific LAW assigns, that ‘intolerance’ must be weakness”.
“An absolute intolerance will be found to be weakness at some measure of degree to and from the intolerance’s environment, equal to the difference in degrees.”
“In physical Existence, there is nothing that we do without consequence.”
“The health of the Child is 1st priority. The health of Society is naturally to follow.”
“Stomp hardly in War with Your flag of battle. March proudly in peace/piece with Your flag of many colors.”
“To separate the adults from the youths, is to create a division in time.”
“Be Your own mirror.”
“The smallest features have the largest consequence, when the significance of the smallest feature is featured.”
“There is nothing done that can-not be un-done and there is nothing un-done that can-not be done.”
“Every Individual, in every State/state, has and idea of America. Let’s help them, them over there be American.” (Perhaps we should get the agreement of the States before getting the agreement of the World.)
“Time does not heal all wounds, but it does allow for the approach to that time.
“I don’t care what they say. There is something about You that is just BEAUTIFUL. I don’t care what they say. There is something about You that is at fault.”
“‘I’m fairly sure that that the saying doesn’t go, “If You can’t beat ’em, hire somebody that can.'”
“The LAW can never fail, only we can fail, to recognize it.”
“If I could save time in a bottle, I’d have no, un-bottled future.”
“Cornering the market on time, would be like, putting myself in the corner.”
“Under a Great Leader are Great Followers, and above Great Followers must be,
even Greater Followers in the Lead, for Great Leaders and Followers, to be under.”
“Every leader is a great follower, and every great follower is a great leader.”
“One can do much more damage in support of another individual than in opposition to them.”
“The spread of democracy by rifle, bomb, or business contract is Tyranny.”
“If You find Yourself in an un-righteous, un-holy, un-natural, and un-GODly war, and You would like to win, don’t stop fighting.”
“Sometimes You must let Yourself be beaten to remain un-defeated.”
Because “Spherical-turnaround” is true, the ‘letter of the LAW is Constitutionally inferior to the ‘Spirit of the LAW’. A skilled linguist may interpret anything they choose in the ‘letter of the LAW’
That will it for now. But, some of these are so good, that some-one must have came up with them in the past. Of course I would not own those. Still it’s just reason that the others belong to me and not some individual or business that decides to just put their name on them. I’m going to keep adding to them, and we’ll have a wink about that other individual or business, if You see one drive by on a bus. I may even try to sue them, but I don’t have much of history with suing. Until next time, keep Your Homes well.