Well this is it. As I have said I can’t be sure of the number of individuals who have viewed HomeKeeperU.com. My host says I’ve had 14,327 views and 4,036 unique visitors. I am positive that, not more than a week ago there approximately 8,900 unique visitors. I can’t be sure about comments until I have another $105.00 to check on the comment function and right now I need every penny I have for a Defense Attorney. If You’re not up to date, I accrued 7 criminal charges against me 6 moths after filing 2 civil suits implicating ‘Big-business’ for taking my 9th and 4th Amendment Rights. Which could be coincidence except that the criminal proceedings have left me without 5th and 6th Amendment Rights. Depending on these transmissions and whom is able to view them perhaps there’s a denial of my 1st Amendment Rights as well.
There’s a (not good) chance that if I can’t hire an Attorney That I may have to represent myself. My income is too much to qualify for a Public Defender $1,500.00 down and $500.00 a month has not been enough to retain an Attorney.
My attempt is to leave You out of it and handle this fight myself. But, if I am jailed I have lost the fight, maybe my life as I know it. So, this is about the Rights of the American Citizen. I have renamed “My Motion to Dismiss All Charges”. It is now my “Statement Against Pending Charges” and I’m going to edit it following the completion of this page. If I am jailed It will set the precedent that any other Citizen may make a statement against You, “Murder, Rape, Disorderly Conduct”, whatever allegation. You can be jailed, deprived of, Liberty, Property, and Life as You know it, without ever having the Right to say, “I’m innocent.” You will be able to be held for as long as what someone determines “speedy” to mean. In one real case that I know of it was 1 year before ever having a trial. This will all be possible just because another citizen said You did ‘this or that’. There doesn’t have to be a shred of proof. There only has to be what a Judge says is “Probable Cause”, based on one person’s allegation.
With such a precedent in it, America will be without liberty and it will be without freedom. These will be only an illusion for as long as You hope they will last. These are “YOUR” Rights, not just mine. If every American both Government and non-Government asked each other does the American citizen have Rights, would there be agreement that we do? I ask every American to ask themselves and ask each-other that very question and if the answer is we don’t have a Right to a defense before the trial is this the “United States of America” as its Constitution outlines?
The following may come up in any discussion of the issues:
6th Amendment
In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against them; except/accept that any witness be in regulated, or un-regulated posture or irregulated danger; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in their favor and to have the assistance of counsel for their defense.
Regulated, is a set and standard public schedule, in which compulsory and non-compulsory witnesses may be attained by the accused.
So Your town may have a schedule, say Monday, Wednesday, and Friday that the accuser may have access to the same witnesses and those places from 7am to 12pm while the accused has access from 1pm to 9pm then the accuser has from 10pm to 12am. Then switch the schedule for the other 4 days and following week. Of course it would be best to have State and Federal alignment to Your town’s schedule, checkable on every cell-phone.
Un-regulated, is a flexible schedule for witnesses of the accuser and/or the accused.
You may have the case that doesn’t matter if You assess the same witnesses at the same time or which-ever time, You are able to agree, on different than scheduled times.
Irregulated, is when there is no safe schedule for witnesses of the accuser and/or the accused.
5th Amendment.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb, except when the individual can-not present progress in their Life and/or station since they were convicted or placed on probation. In presenting such evidence an individual is presenting their willingness to change for the good of Society. An individual shall not be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against theirself, nor deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of LAW; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.
It is the LAW that previous cases not be used against You in a Court of LAW, because it is being tried twice for the same crime no matter how much or little relevance You give the previous crimes. So to assess the accused’s value and commitment to Society, we may simply evaluate the accused’s entire life since the last conviction. Then they are not being tried for the same crime but we are not being naïve to a life chosen for crime. A person, rather all of us persons in “We the People” are worth investigating the life since the crime.
This next paragraph is from the criminal proceedings that I am currently involved with. Following the paragraph is the solution from at least 1 problem that could arise in LAW, if the Courts hold to it.
Your Honor, Mr./Mrs./Ms. Attorney, ‘Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury,’ I contend, hopefully with agreement that, to be a Police Officer one must be within the LAW and when stepping outside of the LAW, an Officer does not represent the State which imposed those Laws. When an Officer is outside of LAW, they can-not represent the Law which they are breaking and as such, when not adhering to the LAW the Police Officer, can be arrested by another Officer, within the LAW. So, an Officer outside of the LAW, has only the Rights of any civilian. When Officer Sharky refused my statement and initiated physical contact, he was only under the same protection of LAW as myself. In a somewhat paranoid state of mind. I have further communications regarding my paranoid state of mind. When I was denied ‘due process’ it only reinforced the thought that these Officers would take my life. I did push Officer Sharky when he grabbed my wrist. I simply wanted to get to public view, through the Police Station door and estimated that I could not do so. In that realization I submitted in total and full.
Problem: The Police can’t be expected to be within every facet of LAW/Legal, every moment of the day. They couldn’t spit on the sidewalk and make a legitimate arrest.
Solution: They must be within the ‘Point of LAW.’
So, If, a Law Enforcement Agent smoked a joint with old high school friends, a day before a $30,000 cocaine bust. The Law Enforcement Agent would not be in the point of LAW, and it would be a good bust. But, if the Law Enforcement Agent was stoned or smoking a joint during the bust, that ‘one’ Agent would be outside of the ‘Point of LAW. The Agent lays down their vesture of Law Enforcement and is counted as a civilian. The bust would, then, be bad.’ If the Agent controversially shot a ‘drug dealer’ and it can be ‘proven beyond a reasonable doubt,’ that the joint that they smoked the day before was a contributing factor to the decision to fire his/her side-arm. The bust is still good but the shooting is not.
If an Officer can be outside of the ‘Point of LAW,’ when making an arrest. They could be receiving personal profit from drug dealing, while arresting drug dealers. They could engage in rape, while arresting someone for resisting. They can beat a Grandmother, with her Grandchild, down in the street and a civilian could not stop the un-LAWFUL behavior.
Business Rights Concerns
The claim that, it is absurd to allow an individual the Right to dress as they please, in the workplace is easily cleared by utilizing the “Climate and Environment of the Shared Reality of Numbers.” With consideration of the business, climate, and environment, then the community, town/city, State and so-on. Either may hold accountability, the individual or the climate and environment.
The claim of the Right to fire or terminate an individual’s ability to Exist industrially, without the access to land and the knowledge of how to provide from that land for the individual and/or the individual(‘s’) family from any land, is resolved as follows.
First, the individual maintains Individual Rights as a representative of (a) business(es) and that business may empower its employee with the additional Right, in the ability to terminate an employee. The employee to be terminated retains the “Right to Exist” and practice individual Rights. A Consult may be formed of 12 individuals, 6 chosen by the business/company and 6 chosen by the, individual to be terminated. Upon a deadlock/gridlock, the individual may choose 2 of the 12 and the business/company may choose 1 and the 3 declare a decision by majority rule. If the individual or any of Consult appear 3 times together the business/company may reverse the 1 and 2 of the deadlock/gridlock decision, having 2 of the final 3 chosen by the business/company and 1 by the, individual to be terminated, upon that termination all of those that can be associated to mutiny may be fired as well. Any being fired may challenge in a Court of Law. If the Court finds that an individual should not have been terminated that individual is entitled 3 years at that same business/company with no behavior deemed terminal to employment and the behavior tried is protected. Within the 3 years the business/company may find the individual employment of equal or better pay with the same tolerance and company longevity as the employing business/company. The fact that the individual employee took their termination to trial is protected information.
I will not be adding to HomeKeeperU, until there is progress on any of its initiatives, I am jailed, or clear of imprisonment. If I am jailed I hope to another inform You of the event. In that case I will leave HomeKeeperU.com on the internet for as long as I possibly can. If I am not jailed I will report back with the “Proposal for the Occupational Parenting Amendment, Midnight’s Perspective Math, or the completion of the Spherical Set E-LAW Human Earth.
If these transmissions have been reaching You at least some part of the ‘powers that be’ have allowed for that to take place. It is in those powers that I have and will place my hope.
GOD Bless You and Until next time, keep your homes well.
Welcome Occupational Parenting Health and Happiness The Human Element The Perceivable Universe The Environment Word Play Conclusion Glossary In The Kitchen Pets Tips Cleaning Tips Parenting Tips Blog